Critique a draft before rewriting it

작성자: AILesson4 분 소요테스트::ChatGPTClaudeGemini검토일: 2026-08-28

빠른 답변

Diagnose the highest-impact problems without replacing the author’s intent. 제공할 내용: Draft, Purpose and audience, Constraints. 예상 결과: Prioritized editorial feedback and a focused revision plan.

맥락 추가

텍스트는 이 브라우저에 유지됩니다. AILesson Prompts는 이를 모델이나 서버로 보내지 않습니다.

DraftPurpose and audienceConstraints

프롬프트

채워지지 않은 필드는 플레이스홀더로 표시되므로 프롬프트를 복사하고 편집할 수 있습니다

Critique this draft before proposing any rewrite.

Purpose and audience:
[goal]

Constraints:
[constraints]

Draft:
[draft]

Evaluate the draft for goal alignment, clarity, evidence, structure, audience fit, and factual consistency. Quote short excerpts to locate each issue. Prioritize no more than five changes by impact.

Return:
1. What already works and should be preserved
2. High-impact issues, with evidence and consequence
3. Questions that must be answered before revision
4. A revision plan in priority order

Do not rewrite the draft unless I ask in a follow-up.

Playground에서 사용해 보기

기본적으로 비공개프롬프트 구성은 브라우저에서 로컬로 이루어집니다. 조직에서 허용하지 않는 한 기밀 정보를 AI 서비스에 입력하지 마세요.

입력에서 결과까지

적용 예시

구체적인 맥락이 이 레시피를 바로 사용할 수 있는 결과로 바꾸는 방법을 확인하세요

실제 입력

Draft: Join our neighborhood repair café next Saturday! Volunteers will help fix small household items, and the event will reduce waste for everyone. Bring lamps, toasters, clothing, or anything broken. The café runs from 10 a.m. to 1 p.m. at Riverside Community Room. Repairs are free, but parts might cost extra. We fixed nearly everything last time, so your item will probably leave working. Please arrive early because we may be busy. Children are welcome. Register through the form by Thursday.
Purpose and audience: A short email to neighborhood residents that explains the repair café and gets people with suitable items to register.
Constraints: Friendly and trustworthy tone; maximum 170 words; must retain the date wording, opening hours, venue, Thursday registration deadline, and possible parts cost. Do not promise that an item can be repaired.

예시 출력

What already works and should be preserved

The opening clearly identifies the event and timing. Examples such as “lamps, toasters, clothing” help residents judge relevance. The draft includes the hours, venue, registration deadline, free repair help, and possible parts cost. Its friendly tone suits a neighborhood email.

High-impact issues

“Your item will probably leave working” conflicts with the no-promise constraint and creates an expectation volunteers may not meet.
“Anything broken” is broader than “small household items.” Residents could register unsuitable or unsafe items.
“Next Saturday” is required, but no calendar date is supplied. Recipients who reopen or forward the email may not know which Saturday it means.
“Children are welcome” does not explain whether supervision or participation conditions apply. No additional rule should be invented.
“Please arrive early” is vague and competes with the stronger desired action: registering by Thursday.

Questions before revision

Which item types cannot be accepted? Does registration reserve a time or only estimate demand? What calendar date is next Saturday? Are there conditions attached to children attending?

Revision plan
Remove the repair-likelihood claim and state only what volunteers will attempt.
Define eligible items using confirmed limits.
Make Thursday registration the clearest call to action.
Add the calendar date if available while retaining “next Saturday.”
Clarify arrival and child-attendance guidance only after those details are confirmed.

효과가 있는 이유

1
Diagnosis comes before generation, preserving authorial control.
2
A five-item limit keeps feedback actionable instead of exhaustive.

결과 확인

Is every criticism tied to the stated purpose or constraints?
Does the plan preserve the strongest parts of the draft?

안심하고 사용하세요

자주 묻는 질문

이 레시피를 언제 사용해야 하는지, 무엇을 제공해야 하는지, 그리고 어떤 부분에서 사람의 검토가 여전히 중요한지에 대한 실용적인 답변

What should I prepare before using “Critique a draft before rewriting it”?

For “Critique a draft before rewriting it,” prepare Draft, Purpose and audience, and Constraints. Replace placeholders only with information you can verify. If a detail is unknown, preserve that uncertainty explicitly instead of asking the model to infer it.

When is the “Critique a draft before rewriting it” result not ready to use?

The result is not ready if it does not yet deliver the stated outcome—Prioritized editorial feedback and a focused revision plan—from the supplied evidence, or if it relies on unresolved assumptions, missing approvals, or invented details. Use the checks as release gates: revise the source inputs or assign a named, authorized reviewer instead of polishing an unsupported output.

Which AI tools have recorded tests for “Critique a draft before rewriting it”?

The published test record for “Critique a draft before rewriting it” lists ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini as of 2026-08-28. This confirms recorded runs, not guaranteed compatibility or identical results in later product versions. For another tool or version, keep every constraint visible and repeat the result checks before use.

더 많은 탐색 방법