Critique a draft before rewriting it

Auteur: AILesson4 min de préparationTesté avec:ChatGPTClaudeGeminiRévisé: 2026-08-28

Réponse rapide

Diagnose the highest-impact problems without replacing the author’s intent. Fournir: Draft, Purpose and audience, Constraints. Résultat attendu: Prioritized editorial feedback and a focused revision plan.

1

Ajouter votre contexte

Votre texte reste dans ce navigateur. AILesson Prompts ne l’envoie ni à un modèle ni à un serveur.

2

Votre prompt

Les champs non remplis restent visibles sous forme d’espaces réservés, afin que vous puissiez quand même copier et modifier le prompt.

Critique this draft before proposing any rewrite.

Purpose and audience:
[goal]

Constraints:
[constraints]

Draft:
[draft]

Evaluate the draft for goal alignment, clarity, evidence, structure, audience fit, and factual consistency. Quote short excerpts to locate each issue. Prioritize no more than five changes by impact.

Return:
1. What already works and should be preserved
2. High-impact issues, with evidence and consequence
3. Questions that must be answered before revision
4. A revision plan in priority order

Do not rewrite the draft unless I ask in a follow-up.
Essayer dans le Playground
Privé par défautL’assemblage du prompt se fait localement dans votre navigateur. Évitez de placer des informations confidentielles dans un service d’IA, sauf si votre organisation l’autorise.

De l'entrée au résultat

Un exemple détaillé

Voyez comment un contexte concret transforme cette recette en résultat utilisable.

Entrée réelle

Draft
Join our neighborhood repair café next Saturday! Volunteers will help fix small household items, and the event will reduce waste for everyone. Bring lamps, toasters, clothing, or anything broken. The café runs from 10 a.m. to 1 p.m. at Riverside Community Room. Repairs are free, but parts might cost extra. We fixed nearly everything last time, so your item will probably leave working. Please arrive early because we may be busy. Children are welcome. Register through the form by Thursday.
Purpose and audience
A short email to neighborhood residents that explains the repair café and gets people with suitable items to register.
Constraints
Friendly and trustworthy tone; maximum 170 words; must retain the date wording, opening hours, venue, Thursday registration deadline, and possible parts cost. Do not promise that an item can be repaired.

Exemple de sortie

  1. What already works and should be preserved

The opening clearly identifies the event and timing. Examples such as “lamps, toasters, clothing” help residents judge relevance. The draft includes the hours, venue, registration deadline, free repair help, and possible parts cost. Its friendly tone suits a neighborhood email.

  1. High-impact issues
  • “Your item will probably leave working” conflicts with the no-promise constraint and creates an expectation volunteers may not meet.
  • “Anything broken” is broader than “small household items.” Residents could register unsuitable or unsafe items.
  • “Next Saturday” is required, but no calendar date is supplied. Recipients who reopen or forward the email may not know which Saturday it means.
  • “Children are welcome” does not explain whether supervision or participation conditions apply. No additional rule should be invented.
  • “Please arrive early” is vague and competes with the stronger desired action: registering by Thursday.
  1. Questions before revision

Which item types cannot be accepted? Does registration reserve a time or only estimate demand? What calendar date is next Saturday? Are there conditions attached to children attending?

  1. Revision plan

  2. Remove the repair-likelihood claim and state only what volunteers will attempt.

  3. Define eligible items using confirmed limits.

  4. Make Thursday registration the clearest call to action.

  5. Add the calendar date if available while retaining “next Saturday.”

  6. Clarify arrival and child-attendance guidance only after those details are confirmed.

Pourquoi cela fonctionne

  1. 1

    Diagnosis comes before generation, preserving authorial control.

  2. 2

    A five-item limit keeps feedback actionable instead of exhaustive.

Vérifier le résultat

  • Is every criticism tied to the stated purpose or constraints?

  • Does the plan preserve the strongest parts of the draft?

Utilisez-la en toute confiance

Questions fréquentes

Des réponses pratiques sur le bon moment pour utiliser cette recette, ce qu’il faut fournir et les cas où une vérification humaine reste nécessaire.

What should I prepare before using “Critique a draft before rewriting it”?

For “Critique a draft before rewriting it,” prepare Draft, Purpose and audience, and Constraints. Replace placeholders only with information you can verify. If a detail is unknown, preserve that uncertainty explicitly instead of asking the model to infer it.

When is the “Critique a draft before rewriting it” result not ready to use?

The result is not ready if it does not yet deliver the stated outcome—Prioritized editorial feedback and a focused revision plan—from the supplied evidence, or if it relies on unresolved assumptions, missing approvals, or invented details. Use the checks as release gates: revise the source inputs or assign a named, authorized reviewer instead of polishing an unsupported output.

Which AI tools have recorded tests for “Critique a draft before rewriting it”?

The published test record for “Critique a draft before rewriting it” lists ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini as of 2026-08-28. This confirms recorded runs, not guaranteed compatibility or identical results in later product versions. For another tool or version, keep every constraint visible and repeat the result checks before use.

Faites avancer votre travail