Explain a concept at multiple levels

작성자: AILesson5 분 소요테스트::ChatGPT검토일: 2026-08-28

빠른 답변

Vary vocabulary and depth while preserving the same core definition, conditions, and limits. 제공할 내용: Concept and source, Learner levels, Explanation rules. 예상 결과: Layered explanations, analogy limits, prerequisite map, and checks for each level.

맥락 추가

텍스트는 이 브라우저에 유지됩니다. AILesson Prompts는 이를 모델이나 서버로 보내지 않습니다.

Concept and sourceLearner levelsExplanation rules

프롬프트

채워지지 않은 필드는 플레이스홀더로 표시되므로 프롬프트를 복사하고 편집할 수 있습니다

Explain the concept at the specified levels using the supplied source.

Concept and authoritative material:
[concept]

Each audience's prior knowledge, language, and purpose:
[levels]

Fixed terms, depth, misconceptions, analogy limits, notation, and exclusions:
[rules]

Identify a core meaning that must remain invariant across levels. For each level adjust vocabulary, abstraction, examples, notation, and causal depth—not truth or certainty. Return prerequisite assumptions, explanation, one source-grounded example, optional analogy with where it breaks, common misconception, one quick understanding check, and bridge to the next level. Do not say a simpler explanation is the whole truth when it omits a condition. Do not invent facts, anthropomorphize mechanisms misleadingly, or use an analogy as proof. Finish with an invariant audit comparing definitions, scope, conditions, and exceptions across levels.

Playground에서 사용해 보기

기본적으로 비공개프롬프트 구성은 브라우저에서 로컬로 이루어집니다. 조직에서 허용하지 않는 한 기밀 정보를 AI 서비스에 입력하지 마세요.

입력에서 결과까지

적용 예시

구체적인 맥락이 이 레시피를 바로 사용할 수 있는 결과로 바꾸는 방법을 확인하세요

실제 입력

Concept and source: Opportunity cost. Course definition: value of the next best alternative forgone when a choice is made. It can include non-monetary alternatives. Tutorial example: a train with a lower ticket price may have higher opportunity cost if it causes two hours of lost paid work.
Learner levels: Level 1: 12-year-old familiar with choosing between weekend activities. Level 2: first-year economics student preparing short exam explanations. Level 3: new manager comparing employee time allocations and needing to avoid double counting accounting cost and forgone work.
Explanation rules: Use 'next best alternative' at every level. Do not say opportunity cost equals all rejected alternatives or always equals money. At Level 2 distinguish it from sunk cost only briefly; at Level 3 mention perspective and scarce resource. No equations required.

예시 출력

Invariant: opportunity cost is the value of the next best alternative forgone because a choice uses a scarce opportunity. It is not the sum of every rejected option and need not be money.

Level 1: If you spend Saturday afternoon at football, you cannot use the same afternoon for your next best choice—perhaps a friend's party. The value that party had to you is the opportunity cost of football. Analogy: one seat can hold one person; useful for exclusivity, but choices can use several scarce resources, not just one “seat.” Check: if you reject three activities, which one determines opportunity cost? The next best, not all three.

Level 2: Use the invariant definition and identify the actual next-best feasible alternative. In the train example, ticket price is only one part; two hours of forgone paid work may make the cheaper ticket's opportunity cost higher. A sunk cost is past and unrecoverable, while opportunity cost concerns the alternative forgone by the current choice. Check: name the alternative, its value, and why it is forgone.

Level 3: Specify decision-maker perspective, scarce resource and feasible alternatives. Allocating an analyst to Project A for a day forgoes the value of their next best feasible use. Avoid adding the same salary both as an accounting cost and again inside the valued forgone output without a consistent framework. Bridge: compare incremental alternatives and state whose value is measured. All levels preserve the same definition and non-monetary scope.

효과가 있는 이유

1
A shared invariant prevents beginner explanations from contradicting advanced ones.
2
Explicit analogy limits reduce the chance that a helpful metaphor becomes a learned misconception.

결과 확인

Are definition, scope, conditions, and certainty consistent across levels?
Does each level assume only the stated prior knowledge?
Are analogy limits and omitted complexities clearly marked?

안심하고 사용하세요

자주 묻는 질문

이 레시피를 언제 사용해야 하는지, 무엇을 제공해야 하는지, 그리고 어떤 부분에서 사람의 검토가 여전히 중요한지에 대한 실용적인 답변

What should I prepare before using “Explain a concept at multiple levels”?

For “Explain a concept at multiple levels,” prepare Concept and source, Learner levels, and Explanation rules. Replace placeholders only with information you can verify. If a detail is unknown, preserve that uncertainty explicitly instead of asking the model to infer it.

When is the “Explain a concept at multiple levels” result not ready to use?

The result is not ready if it does not yet deliver the stated outcome—Layered explanations, analogy limits, prerequisite map, and checks for each level—from the supplied evidence, or if it relies on unresolved assumptions, missing approvals, or invented details. Use the checks as release gates: revise the source inputs or assign a named, authorized reviewer instead of polishing an unsupported output.

Which AI tools have recorded tests for “Explain a concept at multiple levels”?

The published test record for “Explain a concept at multiple levels” lists ChatGPT as of 2026-08-28. This confirms recorded runs, not guaranteed compatibility or identical results in later product versions. For another tool or version, keep every constraint visible and repeat the result checks before use.

더 많은 탐색 방법