Review an assignment draft without writing the answer

작성자: AILesson8 분 소요테스트::ChatGPT검토일: 2026-08-28

빠른 답변

Diagnose a learner's draft against instructions and rubric while preserving authorship. 제공할 내용: Assignment and rubric, Learner draft, Feedback preferences. 예상 결과: A rubric-linked feedback report with evidence, questions, priorities, and a self-revision plan.

맥락 추가

텍스트는 이 브라우저에 유지됩니다. AILesson Prompts는 이를 모델이나 서버로 보내지 않습니다.

Assignment and rubricLearner draftFeedback preferences

프롬프트

채워지지 않은 필드는 플레이스홀더로 표시되므로 프롬프트를 복사하고 편집할 수 있습니다

Review this assignment draft as a coach, not a substitute author.

Exact assignment, rubric, level, allowed help, sources, and submission rules:
[assignment]

Learner's exact draft, citations, notes, uncertainties, and unfinished sections:
[draft]

Feedback depth, deadline, priorities, question policy, and authorship limits:
[feedback]

First restate the task and identify any conflict or missing rubric information. Evaluate each applicable criterion using exact locations or short excerpts from the draft. Separate what is already demonstrated, what is partially supported, what is missing, and what cannot be judged. Do not invent sources, claims, evidence, personal experience, sentences for submission, or finished answers. Do not provide a replacement draft. For each high-priority issue, explain why it matters, ask one question that helps the learner make the decision, and suggest a revision action expressed as an operation rather than submission-ready prose. Distinguish content, reasoning, evidence, structure, citation, and surface-language issues. End with a prioritized self-revision checklist and a final verification pass tied to the rubric.

Playground에서 사용해 보기

기본적으로 비공개프롬프트 구성은 브라우저에서 로컬로 이루어집니다. 조직에서 허용하지 않는 한 기밀 정보를 AI 서비스에 입력하지 마세요.

입력에서 결과까지

적용 예시

구체적인 맥락이 이 레시피를 바로 사용할 수 있는 결과로 바꾸는 방법을 확인하세요

실제 입력

Assignment and rubric: Grade 10 history paragraph, 250-300 words: assess whether factory reform between 1833 and 1847 substantially improved child workers' lives. Rubric: defensible judgment, two supplied primary-source details, contextual reasoning, one limitation, clear paragraph structure. Only sources A-C may be used. AI may give feedback but may not compose submission text.
Learner draft: Factory reform improved children's lives. The 1833 Act made children work fewer hours. Source A says inspectors visited factories. This was good because factories had to follow rules. The 1847 Act reduced hours again, so life was much better. However, some owners may not listen. Therefore the reforms worked. [238 words in full draft; citations not yet formatted.]
Feedback preferences: Feedback first, no rewritten sentences or proposed thesis. Ask questions before suggestions. Submission tomorrow; prioritize reasoning and source use, then citations. Keep feedback under 450 words.

예시 출력

Task check: the paragraph must assess degree, use two specific details from sources A-C, add context, and address a limitation. The excerpt shows a conclusion but does not yet demonstrate all of those requirements. I cannot judge the omitted portions of the 238-word draft.

Highest priority — defensible judgment and reasoning Evidence: “life was much better” states degree but the excerpt does not define what improvement means or weigh enforcement against reduced hours. Question: which measure of children's lives can your supplied sources actually support—hours, safety, health, income, or enforcement? Revision operation: choose the supported measure, then qualify the degree of improvement after weighing the strongest limitation. Do not simply intensify “much better.”

Source use Evidence: Source A is named, but “inspectors visited factories” is not a precise detail and its connection to actual compliance is assumed. Only one source is visible. Question: what exact detail in A shows inspectors' power or limits, and which detail in B or C tests whether reduced legal hours changed practice? Revision operation: add two accurate details in your own words, identify their source, and explain how each changes the judgment.

Limitation Evidence: “some owners may not listen” is plausible but currently unsupported and vague. Question: does one allowed source provide enforcement, evasion, coverage, or implementation evidence? Revision operation: replace speculation with the permitted source evidence, or label the limitation more narrowly if the sources cannot establish prevalence.

Self-revision order: verify every factual detail against A-C; decide the supported measure and qualified judgment; add the second source detail; explain rather than repeat each detail; test the limitation against the judgment; format citations; finally confirm 250-300 words and every rubric item. I have not supplied submission-ready wording or a thesis.

효과가 있는 이유

1
Rubric-linked evidence makes feedback inspectable without taking over the learner's decisions.
2
Operation-level advice teaches revision while avoiding submission-ready ghostwriting.

결과 확인

Is every judgment tied to the assignment, rubric, and a precise part of the draft?
Does the feedback avoid replacement prose, invented evidence, and finished answers?
Can the learner execute the revision checklist while remaining the author?

안심하고 사용하세요

자주 묻는 질문

이 레시피를 언제 사용해야 하는지, 무엇을 제공해야 하는지, 그리고 어떤 부분에서 사람의 검토가 여전히 중요한지에 대한 실용적인 답변

What should I prepare before using “Review an assignment draft without writing the answer”?

For “Review an assignment draft without writing the answer,” prepare Assignment and rubric, Learner draft, and Feedback preferences. Replace placeholders only with information you can verify. If a detail is unknown, preserve that uncertainty explicitly instead of asking the model to infer it.

When is the “Review an assignment draft without writing the answer” result not ready to use?

The result is not ready if it does not yet deliver the stated outcome—A rubric-linked feedback report with evidence, questions, priorities, and a self-revision plan—from the supplied evidence, or if it relies on unresolved assumptions, missing approvals, or invented details. Use the checks as release gates: revise the source inputs or assign a named, authorized reviewer instead of polishing an unsupported output.

Which AI tools have recorded tests for “Review an assignment draft without writing the answer”?

The published test record for “Review an assignment draft without writing the answer” lists ChatGPT as of 2026-08-28. This confirms recorded runs, not guaranteed compatibility or identical results in later product versions. For another tool or version, keep every constraint visible and repeat the result checks before use.

더 많은 탐색 방법