Turn scattered requirements into a learner-facing specification without inventing policy. قدّم: Source requirements, Learner context, Format and boundaries. النتيجة المتوقعة: A scannable instruction sheet with task, deliverables, process, criteria, policies, and ambiguity log.
1
أضف سياقك
يبقى نصك في هذا المتصفح. لا يرسله AILesson Prompts إلى نموذج أو خادم.
2
الأمر الخاص بك
تبقى الحقول غير المعبأة ظاهرة كعناصر نائبة، لذا يمكنك نسخ الأمر وتحريرها
Write clear learner-facing instructions using only confirmed information.
Goals, tasks, deliverables, dates, criteria, resources, and policies:
[requirements]
Learner level, knowledge, language, access needs, and publication context:
[learners]
Length, tone, headings, examples, contact path, and inference boundaries:
[format]
Separate purpose, what to produce, ordered steps, required inputs, submission method, dates with timezone, evaluation criteria, permitted and prohibited assistance, resources, and help path. Use direct verbs, short sentences, consistent terms, parallel lists, and accessible structure. Distinguish requirements from recommendations and examples. Never invent deadlines, penalties, file formats, policies, exceptions, links, or contact details; preserve unresolved facts as explicit questions for the owner, not learner-facing guesses. Identify contradictions before drafting. Add a final learner checklist and a compact ambiguity log for the instructor. Test whether a learner could answer what, why, when, where, how, and how quality will be judged.
خاص افتراضيًايتم تجميع الأمر محليًا في متصفحك. تجنب وضع معلومات سرية في أي خدمة ذكاء اصطناعي ما لم تسمح مؤسستك بذلك.
من المدخلات إلى النتيجة
مثال عملي
شاهد كيف يحول السياق الملموس هذه الوصفة إلى نتيجة قابلة للاستخدام
المدخل الفعلي
Source requirements
Workshop reflection. Goal: connect one workshop method to the learner's work. Submit 500-700 words by Oct 12 at 17:00 Asia/Shanghai in the LMS text box. Include: chosen method, one real work situation, planned application, one risk, and a success signal. Assessed for completeness, specificity, and connection between method and plan. Peer discussion allowed; final writing individual. Course note also says 'about 600 words due Sunday' without a date. No late policy supplied.
Learner context
Early-career adults, mixed English proficiency. Instructions appear in LMS. Some use screen readers.
Format and boundaries
Under 450 words, plain and supportive, descriptive headings, no invented policy or contact. One brief example of specificity is allowed but must not be reusable as an answer.
مثال على المخرجات
Workshop reflection
Purpose
Show how one workshop method could be applied to a real situation in your work.
What to submit
Write 500-700 words individually. Include all five elements: the method you selected; one real work situation; how you plan to apply the method; one risk or obstacle; and one observable sign that the application succeeded.
How to complete it
Choose one method from the workshop.
Describe a specific work situation without including confidential information.
Explain the connection between the method and your planned actions.
Identify one realistic risk and how you will notice it.
Define a success signal that can be observed. For specificity, “receive a response within the agreed review period” is more checkable than “communication improves”; do not reuse this example unless it matches your real plan.
Review the criteria and submit your final individual writing in the LMS text box. Peer discussion is allowed, but the submitted writing must be your own.
Deadline
Submit by October 12 at 17:00, Asia/Shanghai time, subject to the clarification below.
How it is evaluated
The response is checked for all required elements, specific details, and a clear connection between the selected method and application plan.
Final checklist
500-700 words; five required elements present; real but non-confidential situation; method and plan explicitly connected; final writing completed individually; pasted into the LMS text box before the confirmed deadline.
Instructor ambiguity log
The dated requirement says October 12 at 17:00, while another note says Sunday without a date. Confirm which deadline governs before publishing. No late policy or help contact was supplied, so neither has been added.
لماذا يعمل هذا
1
Requirement-versus-advice labels prevent optional guidance from becoming accidental policy.
2
An ambiguity log keeps missing decisions visible to the responsible owner.
تحقق من النتيجة
Can a learner locate every deliverable, date, method, and criterion?
Are requirements, recommendations, and examples visibly distinct?
Are all unresolved or conflicting facts logged rather than guessed?
استخدمها بثقة
الأسئلة الشائعة
إجابات عملية حول متى تستخدم هذه الوصفة، وما الذي تقدمه، وأين لا تزال المراجعة البشرية مهمة
What should I prepare before using “Write clear course or assignment instructions”?
For “Write clear course or assignment instructions,” prepare Source requirements, Learner context, and Format and boundaries. Replace placeholders only with information you can verify. If a detail is unknown, preserve that uncertainty explicitly instead of asking the model to infer it.
When is the “Write clear course or assignment instructions” result not ready to use?
The result is not ready if it does not yet deliver the stated outcome—A scannable instruction sheet with task, deliverables, process, criteria, policies, and ambiguity log—from the supplied evidence, or if it relies on unresolved assumptions, missing approvals, or invented details. Use the checks as release gates: revise the source inputs or assign a named, authorized reviewer instead of polishing an unsupported output.
Which AI tools have recorded tests for “Write clear course or assignment instructions”?
The published test record for “Write clear course or assignment instructions” lists ChatGPT as of 2026-08-28. This confirms recorded runs, not guaranteed compatibility or identical results in later product versions. For another tool or version, keep every constraint visible and repeat the result checks before use.
ChatGPT
