Draft a quote or service proposal structure

작성자: AILesson9 분 소요테스트::ChatGPT검토일: 2026-08-28

빠른 답변

Organize confirmed needs, scope, deliverables, price, assumptions, exclusions, and acceptance into a reviewable offer. 제공할 내용: Client need and authority, Service and delivery facts, Proposal rules. 예상 결과: A proposal-ready structure with option arithmetic, scope controls, approval gaps, and client decisions.

맥락 추가

텍스트는 이 브라우저에 유지됩니다. AILesson Prompts는 이를 모델이나 서버로 보내지 않습니다.

Client need and authorityService and delivery factsProposal rules

프롬프트

채워지지 않은 필드는 플레이스홀더로 표시되므로 프롬프트를 복사하고 편집할 수 있습니다

Draft the structure and filled content for a quote or service proposal using only supplied facts. Do not create binding terms or prices without authority.

Source-tagged client goals, state, scope, constraints, stakeholders, criteria, budget/timeline statements, and unknowns:
[need]

Capabilities, deliverables, method, roles, dependencies, effort/rates, expenses, taxes, schedule, risks, terms, and proof:
[service]

Currency, validity, pricing authority, legal review, payment, change control, confidentiality, IP, acceptance, format, and prohibited claims:
[rules]

Separate confirmed requirement, supplier interpretation, estimate, assumption, client responsibility, dependency, exclusion, option, and unresolved decision. Preserve who said what and do not invent budget, urgency, availability, outcome, testimonial, discount, tax treatment, legal clause, acceptance, or approval. Show price and schedule arithmetic with units; label estimates/ranges and identify what changes them. If material inputs are missing, produce a non-binding draft with decision placeholders.

Structure: executive fit; current situation and desired outcome; proposed scope; deliverables with acceptance evidence; work plan/milestones; client/supplier roles; assumptions/dependencies; exclusions; options and trade-offs; price breakdown; taxes/expenses; schedule; change control; risks; commercial/legal terms; validity; next decision/signature only if authorized. Make options genuinely different and prevent optional items from appearing included. Include scope-to-price and requirement-to-deliverable matrices, ambiguity/contradiction check, pre-send approval gates, and questions required before a reliable quote.

Playground에서 사용해 보기

기본적으로 비공개프롬프트 구성은 브라우저에서 로컬로 이루어집니다. 조직에서 허용하지 않는 한 기밀 정보를 AI 서비스에 입력하지 마세요.

입력에서 결과까지

적용 예시

구체적인 맥락이 이 레시피를 바로 사용할 수 있는 결과로 바꾸는 방법을 확인하세요

실제 입력

Client need and authority: Client email C1: a 12-person charity wants its monthly donor CSVs from three sources standardized before board reporting; goal is fewer manual category fixes and a documented process. They ask for a fixed-price option and delivery by 30 Sep 2026, but no budget stated. Operations manager recommends; director signs. Confirmed inputs: three sample exports after NDA, current category list, one 90-minute staff workshop. Unknown: row volumes, historical edge cases, whether source formats change, accessibility requirements, and who approves final definitions.
Service and delivery facts: Supplier can deliver discovery/schema workshop, canonical data dictionary, mapping for three current sample CSV formats, validation checklist, two review rounds, 90-minute remote training, and handover guide. No software implementation or ongoing monthly processing. Estimate: discovery 6h, dictionary/mapping 18-24h, checklist/tests 8-12h, training/guide 6h, PM/review 6h. Approved rate £85/h; fixed-price risk buffer up to 15% requires director approval. No travel. Earliest start 7 Sep if NDA/data by 4 Sep. Similar anonymized process artifact may be referenced, but no outcome guarantee.
Proposal rules: GBP, prices exclude VAT; VAT applicability must be confirmed by finance. Quote valid 14 days after issue. 40% start/60% acceptance is a proposed term requiring legal/finance review. IP/confidentiality use standard contract, not draft new clauses. Changes require written estimate and client approval. Acceptance evidence must be observable. Supplier director approves fixed price; legal reviews terms. Proposal PDF, no fake signature.

예시 출력

Status: non-binding draft pending data-volume/edge-case discovery, definition approver, accessibility needs, VAT, fixed-price director approval, and legal/finance terms review.

Proposed outcome: a documented, repeatable standardization process for the three supplied current CSV formats; no guaranteed reduction or ongoing processing. Deliverables/acceptance: D1 approved canonical dictionary—each supplied field/category has definition, owner/approval status; D2 three mappings—representative samples transform to agreed canonical fields with exceptions logged; D3 validation checklist/test pack—normal, blank, unknown-label, duplicate and format-change cases have expected results; D4 training/guide—90-minute session delivered, guide covers run/review/escalation; two review rounds included. Client supplies NDA, samples, current list, representative edge cases, approver, and timely feedback.

Estimated time: 6 + 18-24 + 8-12 + 6 + 6 = 44-54h. Time-and-materials option: £3,740-£4,590 excluding VAT (44×85; 54×85), billed only under approved terms. Fixed-price calculation cannot be final until buffer chosen/approved: range before buffer £3,740-£4,590; a 15% maximum would be £4,301-£5,278.50, not a quoted price. Supplier director must set one figure after discovery.

Schedule assumption: NDA, three representative exports, category list, approver, and accessibility needs by 4 Sep; start 7 Sep; discovery week 1; draft mapping/checklist week 2; review/training/handover by 30 Sep. Late inputs or changed source formats trigger written change estimate, not silent compression. Exclusions: software build, API, ongoing runs, additional formats, data correction decisions, travel.

Options: A T&M range retains uncertainty; B fixed price only after a paid/approved discovery gate; C smaller phase delivers dictionary plus one-source mapping, with other mappings separately priced. Payment 40/60 is proposed, not approved. Use standard contract for IP/confidentiality. Pre-send gates: client questions, finance VAT, director pricing, legal terms, date capacity, PDF accessibility. No signature block until authorized.

효과가 있는 이유

1
Separating assumptions and client responsibilities prevents an attractive total from hiding the conditions needed to deliver
2
Requirement-to-deliverable mapping makes scope, acceptance, and price changes reviewable

결과 확인

Can every deliverable and price line be traced to a confirmed requirement or labeled option
Are estimates, assumptions, dependencies, exclusions, taxes, expenses, and client responsibilities visible
Are legal/commercial terms and acceptance represented only within supplied authority

안심하고 사용하세요

자주 묻는 질문

이 레시피를 언제 사용해야 하는지, 무엇을 제공해야 하는지, 그리고 어떤 부분에서 사람의 검토가 여전히 중요한지에 대한 실용적인 답변

What should I prepare before using “Draft a quote or service proposal structure”?

For “Draft a quote or service proposal structure,” prepare Client need and authority, Service and delivery facts, and Proposal rules. Replace placeholders only with information you can verify. If a detail is unknown, preserve that uncertainty explicitly instead of asking the model to infer it.

When is the “Draft a quote or service proposal structure” result not ready to use?

The result is not ready if it does not yet deliver the stated outcome—A proposal-ready structure with option arithmetic, scope controls, approval gaps, and client decisions—from the supplied evidence, or if it relies on unresolved assumptions, missing approvals, or invented details. Use the checks as release gates: revise the source inputs or assign a named, authorized reviewer instead of polishing an unsupported output.

Which AI tools have recorded tests for “Draft a quote or service proposal structure”?

The published test record for “Draft a quote or service proposal structure” lists ChatGPT as of 2026-08-28. This confirms recorded runs, not guaranteed compatibility or identical results in later product versions. For another tool or version, keep every constraint visible and repeat the result checks before use.

더 많은 탐색 방법