Compare two document versions for material changes

Автор: AILesson7 мин на настройкуПроверено на:ChatGPTПроверено: 2026-08-28

Быстрый ответ

Distinguish changes in obligations, scope, dates, and meaning from editorial rewrites. Укажите: Earlier version, Newer version, Materiality and audience. Ожидаемый результат: A traceable material-change table, impact summary, and review list.

1

Добавьте контекст

ваш текст остаётся в этом браузере. AILesson Prompts не отправляет его ни в модель, ни на сервер.

2

Ваш промпт

Незаполненные поля остаются видимыми как заполнители, поэтому вы всё равно можете скопировать и отредактировать промпт

Compare the two versions and explain material changes.

Earlier version:
[oldVersion]

Newer version:
[newVersion]

Materiality, affected audience, and scope:
[materiality]

Compare meaning, not just wording. Detect additions, removals, narrowed or broadened scope, changed obligations, permissions, thresholds, dates, exceptions, definitions, and responsibility. Separate material, potentially material, and editorial changes. For each material item return: locator, earlier meaning, newer meaning, change type, affected party, practical consequence, and confidence. Quote only the shortest phrases needed. Do not assume a legal or operational effect that the text does not establish. List moved-but-unchanged content, contradictions, and sections that cannot be aligned, then propose human review questions.
Попробовать в Playground
Конфиденциально по умолчаниюПромпт собирается локально в вашем браузере. Не вводите конфиденциальную информацию в сервисы ИИ, если ваша организация этого не разрешает.

От исходных данных к результату

Разобранный пример

Посмотрите, как конкретный контекст превращает этот рецепт в полезный результат

Реальный ввод

Earlier version
[§2 Expenses] Employees must submit travel expenses within 30 calendar days of return. Receipts are required for items above £25. Manager approval is required before booking international travel. [§5 Support] Finance aims to review claims within 10 working days.
Newer version
[§2 Expenses] Employees must submit travel expenses within 20 calendar days of return. Receipts are required for items of £25 or more. Director approval is required before booking international travel. [§3 Support] Finance aims to review complete claims within 10 working days.
Materiality and audience
For employees and approvers, treat deadlines, receipt thresholds, approval authority, and eligibility conditions as material. Section renumbering alone is editorial. Do not provide legal advice.

Пример вывода

Material changes

  1. §2 submission deadline: 30 calendar days → 20 calendar days. Type: shortened obligation window. Affected: employees. Consequence: claims must be submitted 10 days sooner. Confidence: high.
  2. §2 receipt rule: above £25 → £25 or more. Type: threshold inclusion changed. Affected: employees and reviewers. Consequence: exactly £25 now requires a receipt. Confidence: high.
  3. §2 international approval: manager → director. Type: approval authority changed. Affected: travelers, managers, directors. Consequence: manager approval alone no longer satisfies the stated rule. Confidence: high.
  4. Support review target: all claims → complete claims. Type: eligibility condition added. Consequence: whether the 10-day aim applies may now depend on completeness; “complete” is undefined. Confidence: high on wording, medium on operational effect.

Editorial: Support moved from §5 to §3 with the same 10-working-day target. Human review: define a complete claim; confirm transition treatment for trips already booked or claims already open.

Почему это работает

  1. 1

    Meaning-level comparison catches changed conditions that ordinary text diffs obscure.

  2. 2

    Materiality labels focus review while retaining uncertain cases for human judgment.

Проверьте результат

  • Does every reported change show both earlier and newer evidence?

  • Are editorial rewrites separated from changed meaning?

  • Are uncertain consequences labeled rather than asserted?

Используйте уверенно

Часто задаваемые вопросы

Практические ответы о том, когда использовать этот рецепт, что нужно предоставить и где по-прежнему важна проверка человеком

What should I prepare before using “Compare two document versions for material changes”?

For “Compare two document versions for material changes,” prepare Earlier version, Newer version, and Materiality and audience. Replace placeholders only with information you can verify. If a detail is unknown, preserve that uncertainty explicitly instead of asking the model to infer it.

When is the “Compare two document versions for material changes” result not ready to use?

The result is not ready if it does not yet deliver the stated outcome—A traceable material-change table, impact summary, and review list—from the supplied evidence, or if it relies on unresolved assumptions, missing approvals, or invented details. Use the checks as release gates: revise the source inputs or assign a named, authorized reviewer instead of polishing an unsupported output.

Which AI tools have recorded tests for “Compare two document versions for material changes”?

The published test record for “Compare two document versions for material changes” lists ChatGPT as of 2026-08-28. This confirms recorded runs, not guaranteed compatibility or identical results in later product versions. For another tool or version, keep every constraint visible and repeat the result checks before use.

Другие способы изучения

Где этот рецепт применим

Продолжайте работу

AILesson · Рекомендуемые курсы

ваш следующий шаг: примените ИИ на практике

Перейдите от понимания ИИ к выполнению задач. Практикуйтесь в составлении запросов, проверке и улучшении результатов с помощью интерактивных уроков для работы и повседневной жизни.

Просмотреть все курсы