Únete gratis

Compare options with explicit criteria

Autor: AILesson5 min de preparaciónProbado con:ChatGPTClaudeGeminiRevisado el: 2026-08-27

Respuesta rápida

Make trade-offs visible without letting AI pretend to own the decision. Proporciona: Decision, Options, Criteria and priorities. Resultado esperado: A weighted comparison, sensitivity check, and recommendation with caveats.

1

Añade tu contexto

Tu texto permanece en este navegador. AILesson Prompts no lo envía a un modelo ni a un servidor.

2

Tu prompt

Los campos sin rellenar permanecen visibles como marcadores de posición, para que puedas copiar y editar el prompt

Help me compare options for this decision:
[decision]

Options and known facts:
[options]

Criteria and priorities:
[criteria]

First identify missing decision-critical facts. Then create a comparison table with a transparent 1–5 score for each criterion and explain every score using only the information provided. Do not disguise assumptions as facts.

Show how the recommendation changes if the two most important criteria receive twice the weight. End with:
- Best-supported option
- Main trade-off
- What could reverse the recommendation
- Decision that must remain with the human owner
Probar en Playground
Privado de forma predeterminadaLa preparación del prompt se realiza localmente en tu navegador. Evita introducir información confidencial en cualquier servicio de IA, a menos que tu organización lo permita.

De la entrada al resultado

Un ejemplo completo

Mira cómo un contexto concreto convierte esta receta en un resultado que puedes usar

Entrada real

Decision
Choose how a six-person product team should run a two-day planning retreat for 6–7 November.
Options
Option A — Local coworking room: £720 total, 25-minute average commute, available both days, catering not included, reliable Wi-Fi confirmed. Option B — Countryside venue: £1,460 total including lunch, about 90 minutes away by train, available both days, reliable Wi-Fi confirmed, overnight rooms are not included. Option C — Fully remote: no venue or travel cost, everyone already has the required equipment, but the team reports that its last remote planning day had frequent interruptions.
Criteria and priorities
Budget fit and focused working conditions are the top priorities. Travel burden and logistical simplicity are secondary. Use equal weights first, then double the weight of budget fit and focused working conditions. The available budget is £1,500.

Ejemplo de salida

Missing decision-critical facts

Noise and privacy at the coworking room; whether countryside rail fare is included; remote interruption controls; accessibility needs; cancellation terms; and whether the 90-minute journey is one way. These gaps limit confidence.

Equal-weight comparison

OptionBudget fitFocusTravelSimplicityTotal /20
A. Coworking444315
B. Countryside342211
C. Remote525517

Rationale: A is well below budget, has a short commute and confirmed Wi-Fi; catering adds coordination, while focus is plausible but not verified. B fits the budget by only £40, provides a separate venue and lunch, but has the greatest travel and unresolved transport or accommodation logistics. C has no stated cost or travel and uses existing equipment, but the prior remote day provides direct evidence of interruption risk.

Priority-weight sensitivity

Doubling budget and focus gives totals out of 30: A = 23, B = 18, C = 24. C remains narrowly ahead, but its one-point lead makes the result fragile. If remote focus falls to 1, A leads; credible interruption controls would strengthen C.

  • Best-supported option: C, fully remote, by a narrow numerical margin.
  • Main trade-off: Maximum savings and simplicity versus weaker evidence for focused work.
  • What could reverse it: Verified coworking quiet, effective remote interruption controls, or additional countryside travel costs.
  • Human-owner decision: Decide whether the documented focus risk is acceptable or paying £720 for Option A is justified.

Por qué funciona

  1. 1

    It forces the scoring rationale and missing evidence into view.

  2. 2

    A sensitivity check reveals whether the recommendation is robust or fragile.

Comprueba el resultado

  • Can every score be traced to a supplied fact?

  • Does the recommendation change under reasonable weighting?

Úsalo con confianza

Preguntas frecuentes

Respuestas prácticas sobre cuándo usar esta receta, qué debes proporcionar y en qué casos la revisión humana sigue siendo importante

What should I prepare before using “Compare options with explicit criteria”?

For “Compare options with explicit criteria,” prepare Decision, Options, and Criteria and priorities. Replace placeholders only with information you can verify. If a detail is unknown, preserve that uncertainty explicitly instead of asking the model to infer it.

When is the “Compare options with explicit criteria” result not ready to use?

The result is not ready if it does not yet deliver the stated outcome—A weighted comparison, sensitivity check, and recommendation with caveats—from the supplied evidence, or if it relies on unresolved assumptions, missing approvals, or invented details. Use the checks as release gates: revise the source inputs or assign a named, authorized reviewer instead of polishing an unsupported output.

Which AI tools have recorded tests for “Compare options with explicit criteria”?

The published test record for “Compare options with explicit criteria” lists ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini as of 2026-08-27. This confirms recorded runs, not guaranteed compatibility or identical results in later product versions. For another tool or version, keep every constraint visible and repeat the result checks before use.

Más formas de explorar

Dónde encaja esta receta

Indicaciones de textoInvestigación y análisisPlanificación y decisionesPara gerentesPara quienes aprenden y educanDe la evidencia a la decisión

Mantén el trabajo en marcha

AILesson · Cursos recomendados

Tu próximo paso: pon la IA a trabajar

Pasa de entender la IA a poner manos a la obra. Practica cómo dar instrucciones, revisar y mejorar resultados con lecciones interactivas para el trabajo y la vida cotidiana.

Explora todos los cursos
Portada de IA para principiantes

15 lecciones interactivas

IA para principiantes

Inicia una conversación útil con la IA, mejora la respuesta, comprueba lo importante y reconoce cuándo te corresponde dar el siguiente paso.

Explora este curso
Portada de Fundamentos de ChatGPT

10 lecciones interactivas

Fundamentos de ChatGPT

Aprende a usar ChatGPT mediante tres flujos de trabajo prácticos: completa una primera conversación, trabaja con un archivo y usa Projects para llevar un plan comprobado a una nueva conversación.

Explora este curso
Portada de Cómo funciona la IA generativa

7 lecciones interactivas

Cómo funciona la IA generativa

Comprende cómo los chats de IA habituales aprenden patrones del lenguaje, usan los mensajes actuales, construyen respuestas e incorporan fuentes y herramientas.

Explora este curso