Únete gratis

Condense a long report into a ten-slide outline

Autor: AILesson8 min de preparaciónProbado con:ChatGPTRevisado el: 2026-08-28

Respuesta rápida

Translate a report into a decision narrative while retaining source traceability and material limits. Proporciona: Complete report, Audience and decision, Slide constraints. Resultado esperado: A ten-slide evidence map with omitted-detail appendix and fidelity checks.

1

Añade tu contexto

Tu texto permanece en este navegador. AILesson Prompts no lo envía a un modelo ni a un servidor.

2

Tu prompt

Los campos sin rellenar permanecen visibles como marcadores de posición, para que puedas copiar y editar el prompt

Condense the report into an exactly ten-slide presentation outline.

Report:
[report]

Audience, decision, knowledge, objections, and setting:
[decision]

Duration, ten-slide rule, required findings, citation, appendix, and exclusions:
[constraints]

Use only report-supported claims. Build a decision narrative rather than copying the table of contents. For each of ten slides provide assertion title, one message, 1–3 supporting facts, source locators, recommended visual, interpretation boundary, and speaker transition. Preserve denominators, periods, definitions, uncertainty, subgroup differences, dissent, and recommendations' status. Do not average incompatible measures or turn association into causation. Return a narrative spine, slides 1–10, appendix/backup list if allowed, material omissions with rationale, claim-to-source matrix, and a fidelity audit. If ten slides cannot support the requested breadth honestly, recommend scope cuts rather than shrinking every point into unreadable text.
Probar en Playground
Privado de forma predeterminadaLa preparación del prompt se realiza localmente en tu navegador. Evita introducir información confidencial en cualquier servicio de IA, a menos que tu organización lo permita.

De la entrada al resultado

Un ejemplo completo

Mira cómo un contexto concreto convierte esta receta en un resultado que puedes usar

Entrada real

Complete report
[Executive summary] A 12-week flexible-shift pilot covered 4 of 11 service teams. [p.6 Table 2] Scheduled overtime fell from 410 to 352 hours (14.1%) in pilot teams; non-pilot teams fell 3.0% over the same period. Teams were not randomly selected. [p.9] Customer response time was 4.8 hours before and 4.9 after; target ≤5.0. [p.12] 96 of 143 pilot-team employees answered the survey; 71% preferred continuing. Night-shift response was 18 of 39 and preference 50%. [p.15] Two managers reported planning complexity. [p.18] Finance estimates £21k annual savings if the overtime difference persists; estimate excludes training and scheduling software. [Section: Recommendation] Extend six months to all service teams with monthly review. Union consultation is incomplete.
Audience and decision
Executive committee decides whether to extend, modify, or stop. They care about service, cost, workforce fairness, and implementation risk; 15-minute presentation.
Slide constraints
Exactly ten slides, no appendix in the meeting but a backup note list is allowed. Cite page/table. Keep selection limitation, survey denominator/night subgroup, excluded costs, consultation status, and recommendation as recommendation—not decision.

Ejemplo de salida

Spine: observed pilot results are promising but not causal; service stayed within target; workforce and implementation evidence is uneven; choose a controlled next step.

1 “Decision today: extend, modify, or stop the shift pilot”—three options and criteria [Executive summary/Recommendation]. 2 “The pilot covered 4 of 11 non-randomly selected teams”—scope visual; boundary: limited generalizability [Executive summary, p.6]. 3 “Pilot-team overtime fell 14.1%, versus 3.0% elsewhere”—410→352 comparison; boundary: association, not causal estimate [p.6 Table 2]. 4 “Response time remained within the ≤5.0-hour target”—4.8→4.9; do not call improvement [p.9]. 5 “71% of 96/143 respondents preferred continuing”—denominator and non-response [p.12]. 6 “Night-shift evidence is weaker and less positive”—18/39, 50%; fairness question [p.12]. 7 “Planning complexity is an identified implementation cost”—two manager reports; prevalence unknown [p.15]. 8 “£21k savings estimate excludes material costs”—training/software exclusions and persistence assumption [p.18]. 9 “Union consultation is an unresolved launch dependency”—status and decision gate [Recommendation]. 10 “Recommendation: controlled six-month extension with conditions”—monthly service/overtime/fairness review, cost baseline, consultation, stop criteria; label as proposed.

Omitted: unprovided methods/details, not invented. Backup notes: exact definitions, team selection, survey instrument, cost model. Fidelity matrix maps every claim to listed locators.

Por qué funciona

  1. 1

    Decision narrative prioritizes report evidence by audience use rather than document order.

  2. 2

    Claim-to-source mapping guards against meaning drift during aggressive compression.

Comprueba el resultado

  • Are there exactly ten slides with one core message each?

  • Can every number and material claim be traced to the report?

  • Are omissions, limitations, subgroup differences, and recommendation status visible?

Úsalo con confianza

Preguntas frecuentes

Respuestas prácticas sobre cuándo usar esta receta, qué debes proporcionar y en qué casos la revisión humana sigue siendo importante

What should I prepare before using “Condense a long report into a ten-slide outline”?

For “Condense a long report into a ten-slide outline,” prepare Complete report, Audience and decision, and Slide constraints. Replace placeholders only with information you can verify. If a detail is unknown, preserve that uncertainty explicitly instead of asking the model to infer it.

When is the “Condense a long report into a ten-slide outline” result not ready to use?

The result is not ready if it does not yet deliver the stated outcome—A ten-slide evidence map with omitted-detail appendix and fidelity checks—from the supplied evidence, or if it relies on unresolved assumptions, missing approvals, or invented details. Use the checks as release gates: revise the source inputs or assign a named, authorized reviewer instead of polishing an unsupported output.

Which AI tools have recorded tests for “Condense a long report into a ten-slide outline”?

The published test record for “Condense a long report into a ten-slide outline” lists ChatGPT as of 2026-08-28. This confirms recorded runs, not guaranteed compatibility or identical results in later product versions. For another tool or version, keep every constraint visible and repeat the result checks before use.

Más formas de explorar

Dónde encaja esta receta

Indicaciones de textoReescritura y ediciónPresentaciones y oratoriaPara gerentes

Mantén el trabajo en marcha

AILesson · Cursos recomendados

Tu próximo paso: pon la IA a trabajar

Pasa de entender la IA a poner manos a la obra. Practica cómo dar instrucciones, revisar y mejorar resultados con lecciones interactivas para el trabajo y la vida cotidiana.

Explora todos los cursos
Portada de IA para principiantes

15 lecciones interactivas

IA para principiantes

Inicia una conversación útil con la IA, mejora la respuesta, comprueba lo importante y reconoce cuándo te corresponde dar el siguiente paso.

Explora este curso
Portada de Fundamentos de ChatGPT

10 lecciones interactivas

Fundamentos de ChatGPT

Aprende a usar ChatGPT mediante tres flujos de trabajo prácticos: completa una primera conversación, trabaja con un archivo y usa Projects para llevar un plan comprobado a una nueva conversación.

Explora este curso
Portada de Cómo funciona la IA generativa

7 lecciones interactivas

Cómo funciona la IA generativa

Comprende cómo los chats de IA habituales aprenden patrones del lenguaje, usan los mensajes actuales, construyen respuestas e incorporan fuentes y herramientas.

Explora este curso