S'inscrire gratuitement

Condense a long report into a ten-slide outline

Auteur: AILesson8 min de préparationTesté avec:ChatGPTRévisé: 2026-08-28

Réponse rapide

Translate a report into a decision narrative while retaining source traceability and material limits. Fournir: Complete report, Audience and decision, Slide constraints. Résultat attendu: A ten-slide evidence map with omitted-detail appendix and fidelity checks.

1

Ajouter votre contexte

Votre texte reste dans ce navigateur. AILesson Prompts ne l’envoie ni à un modèle ni à un serveur.

2

Votre prompt

Les champs non remplis restent visibles sous forme d’espaces réservés, afin que vous puissiez quand même copier et modifier le prompt.

Condense the report into an exactly ten-slide presentation outline.

Report:
[report]

Audience, decision, knowledge, objections, and setting:
[decision]

Duration, ten-slide rule, required findings, citation, appendix, and exclusions:
[constraints]

Use only report-supported claims. Build a decision narrative rather than copying the table of contents. For each of ten slides provide assertion title, one message, 1–3 supporting facts, source locators, recommended visual, interpretation boundary, and speaker transition. Preserve denominators, periods, definitions, uncertainty, subgroup differences, dissent, and recommendations' status. Do not average incompatible measures or turn association into causation. Return a narrative spine, slides 1–10, appendix/backup list if allowed, material omissions with rationale, claim-to-source matrix, and a fidelity audit. If ten slides cannot support the requested breadth honestly, recommend scope cuts rather than shrinking every point into unreadable text.
Essayer dans le Playground
Privé par défautL’assemblage du prompt se fait localement dans votre navigateur. Évitez de placer des informations confidentielles dans un service d’IA, sauf si votre organisation l’autorise.

De l'entrée au résultat

Un exemple détaillé

Voyez comment un contexte concret transforme cette recette en résultat utilisable.

Entrée réelle

Complete report
[Executive summary] A 12-week flexible-shift pilot covered 4 of 11 service teams. [p.6 Table 2] Scheduled overtime fell from 410 to 352 hours (14.1%) in pilot teams; non-pilot teams fell 3.0% over the same period. Teams were not randomly selected. [p.9] Customer response time was 4.8 hours before and 4.9 after; target ≤5.0. [p.12] 96 of 143 pilot-team employees answered the survey; 71% preferred continuing. Night-shift response was 18 of 39 and preference 50%. [p.15] Two managers reported planning complexity. [p.18] Finance estimates £21k annual savings if the overtime difference persists; estimate excludes training and scheduling software. [Section: Recommendation] Extend six months to all service teams with monthly review. Union consultation is incomplete.
Audience and decision
Executive committee decides whether to extend, modify, or stop. They care about service, cost, workforce fairness, and implementation risk; 15-minute presentation.
Slide constraints
Exactly ten slides, no appendix in the meeting but a backup note list is allowed. Cite page/table. Keep selection limitation, survey denominator/night subgroup, excluded costs, consultation status, and recommendation as recommendation—not decision.

Exemple de sortie

Spine: observed pilot results are promising but not causal; service stayed within target; workforce and implementation evidence is uneven; choose a controlled next step.

1 “Decision today: extend, modify, or stop the shift pilot”—three options and criteria [Executive summary/Recommendation]. 2 “The pilot covered 4 of 11 non-randomly selected teams”—scope visual; boundary: limited generalizability [Executive summary, p.6]. 3 “Pilot-team overtime fell 14.1%, versus 3.0% elsewhere”—410→352 comparison; boundary: association, not causal estimate [p.6 Table 2]. 4 “Response time remained within the ≤5.0-hour target”—4.8→4.9; do not call improvement [p.9]. 5 “71% of 96/143 respondents preferred continuing”—denominator and non-response [p.12]. 6 “Night-shift evidence is weaker and less positive”—18/39, 50%; fairness question [p.12]. 7 “Planning complexity is an identified implementation cost”—two manager reports; prevalence unknown [p.15]. 8 “£21k savings estimate excludes material costs”—training/software exclusions and persistence assumption [p.18]. 9 “Union consultation is an unresolved launch dependency”—status and decision gate [Recommendation]. 10 “Recommendation: controlled six-month extension with conditions”—monthly service/overtime/fairness review, cost baseline, consultation, stop criteria; label as proposed.

Omitted: unprovided methods/details, not invented. Backup notes: exact definitions, team selection, survey instrument, cost model. Fidelity matrix maps every claim to listed locators.

Pourquoi cela fonctionne

  1. 1

    Decision narrative prioritizes report evidence by audience use rather than document order.

  2. 2

    Claim-to-source mapping guards against meaning drift during aggressive compression.

Vérifier le résultat

  • Are there exactly ten slides with one core message each?

  • Can every number and material claim be traced to the report?

  • Are omissions, limitations, subgroup differences, and recommendation status visible?

Utilisez-la en toute confiance

Questions fréquentes

Des réponses pratiques sur le bon moment pour utiliser cette recette, ce qu’il faut fournir et les cas où une vérification humaine reste nécessaire.

What should I prepare before using “Condense a long report into a ten-slide outline”?

For “Condense a long report into a ten-slide outline,” prepare Complete report, Audience and decision, and Slide constraints. Replace placeholders only with information you can verify. If a detail is unknown, preserve that uncertainty explicitly instead of asking the model to infer it.

When is the “Condense a long report into a ten-slide outline” result not ready to use?

The result is not ready if it does not yet deliver the stated outcome—A ten-slide evidence map with omitted-detail appendix and fidelity checks—from the supplied evidence, or if it relies on unresolved assumptions, missing approvals, or invented details. Use the checks as release gates: revise the source inputs or assign a named, authorized reviewer instead of polishing an unsupported output.

Which AI tools have recorded tests for “Condense a long report into a ten-slide outline”?

The published test record for “Condense a long report into a ten-slide outline” lists ChatGPT as of 2026-08-28. This confirms recorded runs, not guaranteed compatibility or identical results in later product versions. For another tool or version, keep every constraint visible and repeat the result checks before use.

Plus de façons d'explorer

Où se situe cette recette

Prompts texteRéécriture et révisionPrésentations et prise de parole en publicPour les managers

Faites avancer votre travail

AILesson · Cours recommandés

Votre prochaine étape : mettez l’IA à contribution

Passez de la compréhension de l'IA à l'action. Entraînez-vous à formuler des requêtes, à évaluer et à améliorer les résultats grâce à des leçons interactives pour le travail et la vie quotidienne.

Découvrir tous les cours
Image de couverture de L’IA pour débutants

15 leçons interactives

L’IA pour débutants

Lancez une conversation utile avec une IA, améliorez sa réponse, vérifiez l’essentiel et sachez quand c’est à vous d’agir.

Découvrir ce cours
Image de couverture de Les bases de ChatGPT

10 leçons interactives

Les bases de ChatGPT

Découvrez ChatGPT à travers trois flux de travail pratiques : mener une première conversation, travailler à partir d’un fichier, puis utiliser Projects pour réutiliser un plan vérifié dans une nouvelle conversation.

Découvrir ce cours
Image de couverture de Comment fonctionne l’IA générative

7 leçons interactives

Comment fonctionne l’IA générative

Comprenez comment les systèmes courants de chat IA apprennent des structures linguistiques, utilisent les messages actuels, construisent leurs réponses et intègrent des sources et des outils.

Découvrir ce cours