Generate formative assessment questions

Autor: AILesson7 min de preparaciónProbado con:ChatGPTRevisado el: 2026-08-28

Respuesta rápida

Create diagnostic questions that reveal reasoning and inform the next teaching move. Proporciona: Content and objectives, Learner evidence, Delivery constraints. Resultado esperado: An objective-aligned question set with answers, diagnoses, and response rules.

1

Añade tu contexto

Tu texto permanece en este navegador. AILesson Prompts no lo envía a un modelo ni a un servidor.

2

Tu prompt

Los campos sin rellenar permanecen visibles como marcadores de posición, para que puedas copiar y editar el prompt

Generate formative assessment questions grounded only in the supplied content.

Material, objectives, prerequisites, and boundaries:
[content]

Learner evidence, misconceptions, language, and access:
[evidence]

Count, time, response mode, grouping, and feedback timing:
[delivery]

Map every question to one objective or prerequisite and state the reasoning it should reveal. Avoid trivia, ambiguity, accidental clues, and keyword-only answers. Make selected-response distractors correspond to named misconceptions. For each item provide the acceptable answer, source-grounded rationale, likely response patterns, what each pattern does and does not prove, and a concrete teaching response. Sequence items so early answers guide later probes. Preserve cognitive demand while making wording accessible. End with coverage and timing audits; flag objectives that cannot be validly checked under these constraints.
Probar en Playground
Privado de forma predeterminadaLa preparación del prompt se realiza localmente en tu navegador. Evita introducir información confidencial en cualquier servicio de IA, a menos que tu organización lo permita.

De la entrada al resultado

Un ejemplo completo

Mira cómo un contexto concreto convierte esta receta en un resultado que puedes usar

Entrada real

Content and objectives
Objective: distinguish correlation from causation and identify a plausible confounder. Correlation means variables vary together; causation needs evidence that changing one produces change in the other; a confounder relates to both. Observation alone does not establish causation.
Learner evidence
Adult introductory class. Several learners say strong correlation proves causation. Plain language; no calculation.
Delivery constraints
Four questions in 6 minutes using individual cards, then immediate feedback. Include one multiple choice and one transfer item.

Ejemplo de salida

  1. Multiple choice: “People carrying lighters have higher lung-cancer rates. What is justified?” Correct: they are associated, but this alone does not show causation. Distractors claim direct causation, reverse causation, or that strength proves cause. If causal options dominate, reteach the observation-versus-intervention distinction.
  2. Short response: name one factor related to both lighter carrying and cancer risk and explain both links. Accept smoking only when both links are stated; a name alone is incomplete.
  3. Error analysis: a headline says neighborhoods with more firefighters have more damage, so firefighters increase damage. Identify the unsupported causal jump; fire size is a plausible confounder. Naming fire size without the reasoning error is partial evidence.
  4. Transfer: employees using a wellbeing app take fewer sick days. Write one supported observation, one unsupported causal claim, and one confounder. Accept varied answers matching the supplied definitions.

Allow about 75 seconds per item plus one minute to scan cards. Both objective parts are sampled twice. Study-design knowledge is outside the stated objective and is not assessed.

Por qué funciona

  1. 1

    Response-linked actions turn questions into teaching decisions rather than mini-tests.

  2. 2

    Misconception-based distractors reveal plausible reasoning.

Comprueba el resultado

  • Is every item linked to an objective and next action?

  • Are answers and diagnoses supported by supplied material?

  • Can learners finish within the delivery constraints?

Úsalo con confianza

Preguntas frecuentes

Respuestas prácticas sobre cuándo usar esta receta, qué debes proporcionar y en qué casos la revisión humana sigue siendo importante

What should I prepare before using “Generate formative assessment questions”?

For “Generate formative assessment questions,” prepare Content and objectives, Learner evidence, and Delivery constraints. Replace placeholders only with information you can verify. If a detail is unknown, preserve that uncertainty explicitly instead of asking the model to infer it.

When is the “Generate formative assessment questions” result not ready to use?

The result is not ready if it does not yet deliver the stated outcome—An objective-aligned question set with answers, diagnoses, and response rules—from the supplied evidence, or if it relies on unresolved assumptions, missing approvals, or invented details. Use the checks as release gates: revise the source inputs or assign a named, authorized reviewer instead of polishing an unsupported output.

Which AI tools have recorded tests for “Generate formative assessment questions”?

The published test record for “Generate formative assessment questions” lists ChatGPT as of 2026-08-28. This confirms recorded runs, not guaranteed compatibility or identical results in later product versions. For another tool or version, keep every constraint visible and repeat the result checks before use.

Mantén el trabajo en marcha