Explain financial data for non-specialist readers

작성자: AILesson8 분 소요테스트::ChatGPT검토일: 2026-08-28

빠른 답변

Translate reconciled financial figures into plain language while preserving basis, period, uncertainty, and non-cash effects. 제공할 내용: Financial data and reconciliation, Confirmed context and limitations, Audience and decision. 예상 결과: A plain-language summary with metric bridge, definitions, comparisons, caveats, decision questions, and number check.

맥락 추가

텍스트는 이 브라우저에 유지됩니다. AILesson Prompts는 이를 모델이나 서버로 보내지 않습니다.

Financial data and reconciliationConfirmed context and limitationsAudience and decision

프롬프트

채워지지 않은 필드는 플레이스홀더로 표시되므로 프롬프트를 복사하고 편집할 수 있습니다

Write a plain-language financial summary using only the supplied reconciled data and confirmed context.

Data:
[data]

Context and limitations:
[context]

Audience and decision:
[audience]

State the period, currency, scope, and accounting or cash basis before interpreting. Define each necessary financial term once in everyday language. Preserve signs, units, denominators, tax treatment, non-cash items, timing, estimates, and material qualifications. Show the arithmetic bridge between headline values. Separate observed figures, calculations, confirmed explanations, hypotheses, forecast assumptions, and unknowns. Do not equate revenue with cash, profit with bank balance, budget variance with performance quality, or correlation with cause. Use comparisons only when periods and definitions are comparable. Produce a short headline, key figures, what changed and why-known, cash or timing implications, limits, decision questions, and a final number-by-number source check.

Playground에서 사용해 보기

기본적으로 비공개프롬프트 구성은 브라우저에서 로컬로 이루어집니다. 조직에서 허용하지 않는 한 기밀 정보를 AI 서비스에 입력하지 마세요.

입력에서 결과까지

적용 예시

구체적인 맥락이 이 레시피를 바로 사용할 수 있는 결과로 바꾸는 방법을 확인하세요

실제 입력

Financial data and reconciliation: Community workshop, April–June versus January–March, CNY, accrual basis, excluding tax. Q2 revenue 420,000 versus Q1 360,000. Direct program costs 238,000 versus 216,000. Operating costs 132,000 versus 126,000. Operating surplus = revenue - both cost groups: Q2 50,000, Q1 18,000. Bank balance fell from 190,000 to 151,000. Q2 cash receipts were 344,000 because 76,000 of invoiced revenue remains receivable. Q2 cash payments were 383,000, including 45,000 prepaid for July venue and 20,000 repayment of an existing equipment loan. Surplus bridge reconciles: +60,000 revenue -22,000 direct costs -6,000 operating costs = +32,000 improvement.
Confirmed context and limitations: Confirmed: Q2 ran 14 workshops versus 12 in Q1; an approved price change affected four workshops and accounts for 16,000 revenue, while the remaining revenue change is not decomposed. July venue prepayment is an asset, not Q2 expense under the supplied statements. Loan principal reduces cash but not Q2 operating surplus. Receivable collection date is unknown. No forecast or causality claim is approved. Q1 and Q2 definitions are otherwise comparable.
Audience and decision: Board volunteers without accounting training. Decision: whether to delay an optional CNY 60,000 equipment purchase until receivables are collected. Under 350 words, calm tone. Define accrual surplus and receivable. Do not provide investment or legal advice. Materiality 10,000. Treasurer reviews before sharing.

예시 출력

Q2 earned more, but available cash fell

The workshop recorded a CNY 50,000 operating surplus for April–June, up CNY 32,000 from January–March. “Accrual surplus” means revenue and costs are recorded when earned or incurred, not necessarily when cash moves. The bridge is: revenue rose 60,000, while direct costs rose 22,000 and operating costs rose 6,000, leaving a 32,000 improvement.

Revenue was 420,000 and total operating costs were 370,000. Four workshops affected by the approved price change explain 16,000 of the revenue increase. The program also ran 14 workshops rather than 12, but the supplied evidence does not fully separate price, volume, and other effects, so no further cause is claimed.

The bank balance nevertheless fell 39,000, from 190,000 to 151,000. Cash receipts were 344,000 and payments were 383,000. This does not contradict the surplus: 76,000 of invoiced revenue is still a receivable—money owed but not yet collected. Payments also included a 45,000 July venue prepayment and 20,000 loan-principal repayment, which reduce cash but are not Q2 operating expenses in these figures.

Decision implication: a 60,000 equipment purchase would exceed the current 39,000 quarterly cash decline and reduce the 151,000 balance, while the collection date for 76,000 remains unknown. The data supports considering a delay or setting a minimum-cash condition; it does not provide a cash forecast. Before deciding, ask when receivables are expected, what other July obligations exist, and whether the purchase is truly optional.

Number check: 420,000−238,000−132,000=50,000; prior 360,000−216,000−126,000=18,000; improvement 32,000. Cash 344,000−383,000=−39,000, matching the bank movement. Treasurer review required.

효과가 있는 이유

1
Arithmetic bridges make simplification transparent instead of merely confident
2
Explicit basis and timing stop readers from confusing accounting results with available cash

결과 확인

Can every number, comparison, and explanation be traced to supplied evidence?
Are revenue, profit, cash, budget, forecast, and one-off items kept distinct?
Could the intended reader identify the decision without losing material caveats?

안심하고 사용하세요

자주 묻는 질문

이 레시피를 언제 사용해야 하는지, 무엇을 제공해야 하는지, 그리고 어떤 부분에서 사람의 검토가 여전히 중요한지에 대한 실용적인 답변

What should I prepare before using “Explain financial data for non-specialist readers”?

For “Explain financial data for non-specialist readers,” prepare Financial data and reconciliation, Confirmed context and limitations, and Audience and decision. Replace placeholders only with information you can verify. If a detail is unknown, preserve that uncertainty explicitly instead of asking the model to infer it.

When is the “Explain financial data for non-specialist readers” result not ready to use?

The result is not ready if it does not yet deliver the stated outcome—A plain-language summary with metric bridge, definitions, comparisons, caveats, decision questions, and number check—from the supplied evidence, or if it relies on unresolved assumptions, missing approvals, or invented details. Use the checks as release gates: revise the source inputs or assign a named, authorized reviewer instead of polishing an unsupported output.

Which AI tools have recorded tests for “Explain financial data for non-specialist readers”?

The published test record for “Explain financial data for non-specialist readers” lists ChatGPT as of 2026-08-28. This confirms recorded runs, not guaranteed compatibility or identical results in later product versions. For another tool or version, keep every constraint visible and repeat the result checks before use.

더 많은 탐색 방법