Extract decisions, risks, and actions from a document

작성자: AILesson5 분 소요테스트::ChatGPT검토일: 2026-08-28

빠른 답변

Build a traceable register without turning proposals or discussion into commitments. 제공할 내용: Source document, Extraction scope, Interpretation rules. 예상 결과: Separate decision, risk, and action tables with evidence and unresolved fields.

1

맥락 추가

텍스트는 이 브라우저에 유지됩니다. AILesson Prompts는 이를 모델이나 서버로 보내지 않습니다.

2

프롬프트

채워지지 않은 필드는 플레이스홀더로 표시되므로 프롬프트를 복사하고 편집할 수 있습니다

Extract decisions, risks, and actions from the source.

Document:
[document]

Scope:
[scope]

Interpretation rules:
[rules]

Use only explicit source evidence. Do not convert a proposal, option, question, recommendation, or scheduled discussion into a decision. Do not invent owners, deadlines, probability, or impact. Return three separate tables. Decisions: ID, decision, status, date, decision-maker, evidence locator. Risks: ID, risk statement, cause, consequence, mitigation, owner, evidence locator. Actions: ID, action, owner, due date, dependencies, status, evidence locator. Write Not specified for missing fields, flag contradictions and duplicates, and finish with items that need human confirmation.
Playground에서 사용해 보기
기본적으로 비공개프롬프트 구성은 브라우저에서 로컬로 이루어집니다. 조직에서 허용하지 않는 한 기밀 정보를 AI 서비스에 입력하지 마세요.

입력에서 결과까지

적용 예시

구체적인 맥락이 이 레시피를 바로 사용할 수 있는 결과로 바꾸는 방법을 확인하세요

실제 입력

Source document
[Minutes 8 Aug, item 2] The steering group approved moving the launch from 1 October to 15 October. Maya will update the customer notice by 12 August. The team discussed reducing the pilot group but made no decision. [Item 3] If vendor access is not granted by 20 August, integration testing may slip by one week. Leon will ask the vendor for confirmation; no due date was recorded.
Extraction scope
Only launch and integration items in these minutes; include unresolved items.
Interpretation rules
A decision requires words such as approved or agreed. A risk needs an uncertain event and consequence. An action needs an explicit task; preserve missing fields.

예시 출력

Decisions: D-01 | Launch date changed from 1 October to 15 October | Approved | 8 August | Steering group | Item 2. The smaller pilot group is not a decision and is listed for confirmation.

Risks: R-01 | Vendor access may not be granted by 20 August | Cause: vendor access pending | Consequence: integration testing may slip one week | Mitigation: confirmation request only; broader mitigation not specified | Owner: not specified | Item 3. Probability is not specified.

Actions: A-01 | Update customer notice | Maya | 12 August | Depends on approved launch date | Status not specified | Item 2. A-02 | Ask vendor to confirm access | Leon | Not specified | None stated | Status not specified | Item 3.

Human confirmation: decide whether to reduce the pilot group; assign the risk owner; set Leon's due date; confirm whether the revised launch date changes other milestones.

효과가 있는 이유

  1. 1

    Separate registers stop tentative language from being silently promoted to a commitment.

  2. 2

    Evidence locators and missing-field labels support review and follow-up.

결과 확인

  • Is every decision expressed as final in the source?

  • Were any owner, date, probability, or mitigation invented?

  • Does each extracted item include a usable source locator?

안심하고 사용하세요

자주 묻는 질문

이 레시피를 언제 사용해야 하는지, 무엇을 제공해야 하는지, 그리고 어떤 부분에서 사람의 검토가 여전히 중요한지에 대한 실용적인 답변

What should I prepare before using “Extract decisions, risks, and actions from a document”?

For “Extract decisions, risks, and actions from a document,” prepare Source document, Extraction scope, and Interpretation rules. Replace placeholders only with information you can verify. If a detail is unknown, preserve that uncertainty explicitly instead of asking the model to infer it.

When is the “Extract decisions, risks, and actions from a document” result not ready to use?

The result is not ready if it does not yet deliver the stated outcome—Separate decision, risk, and action tables with evidence and unresolved fields—from the supplied evidence, or if it relies on unresolved assumptions, missing approvals, or invented details. Use the checks as release gates: revise the source inputs or assign a named, authorized reviewer instead of polishing an unsupported output.

Which AI tools have recorded tests for “Extract decisions, risks, and actions from a document”?

The published test record for “Extract decisions, risks, and actions from a document” lists ChatGPT as of 2026-08-28. This confirms recorded runs, not guaranteed compatibility or identical results in later product versions. For another tool or version, keep every constraint visible and repeat the result checks before use.

더 많은 탐색 방법

이 레시피가 적합한 상황

작업을 계속 진행하세요