Extract decisions, risks, and actions from a document

Autor: AILesson5 min de configuraçãoTestado com:ChatGPTRevisado em: 2026-08-28

Resposta rápida

Build a traceable register without turning proposals or discussion into commitments. Forneça: Source document, Extraction scope, Interpretation rules. Resultado esperado: Separate decision, risk, and action tables with evidence and unresolved fields.

1

Adicione seu contexto

Seu texto permanece neste navegador. O AILesson Prompts não o envia para um modelo ou servidor.

2

Seu prompt

Campos não preenchidos permanecem visíveis como marcadores de posição, para que você ainda possa copiar e editar o prompt

Extract decisions, risks, and actions from the source.

Document:
[document]

Scope:
[scope]

Interpretation rules:
[rules]

Use only explicit source evidence. Do not convert a proposal, option, question, recommendation, or scheduled discussion into a decision. Do not invent owners, deadlines, probability, or impact. Return three separate tables. Decisions: ID, decision, status, date, decision-maker, evidence locator. Risks: ID, risk statement, cause, consequence, mitigation, owner, evidence locator. Actions: ID, action, owner, due date, dependencies, status, evidence locator. Write Not specified for missing fields, flag contradictions and duplicates, and finish with items that need human confirmation.
Experimente no Playground
Privado por padrãoA montagem do prompt acontece localmente no seu navegador. Evite colocar informações confidenciais em qualquer serviço de IA, a menos que sua organização permita.

Da entrada ao resultado

Um exemplo prático

Veja como um contexto concreto transforma esta receita em um resultado útil

Entrada real

Source document
[Minutes 8 Aug, item 2] The steering group approved moving the launch from 1 October to 15 October. Maya will update the customer notice by 12 August. The team discussed reducing the pilot group but made no decision. [Item 3] If vendor access is not granted by 20 August, integration testing may slip by one week. Leon will ask the vendor for confirmation; no due date was recorded.
Extraction scope
Only launch and integration items in these minutes; include unresolved items.
Interpretation rules
A decision requires words such as approved or agreed. A risk needs an uncertain event and consequence. An action needs an explicit task; preserve missing fields.

Exemplo de saída

Decisions: D-01 | Launch date changed from 1 October to 15 October | Approved | 8 August | Steering group | Item 2. The smaller pilot group is not a decision and is listed for confirmation.

Risks: R-01 | Vendor access may not be granted by 20 August | Cause: vendor access pending | Consequence: integration testing may slip one week | Mitigation: confirmation request only; broader mitigation not specified | Owner: not specified | Item 3. Probability is not specified.

Actions: A-01 | Update customer notice | Maya | 12 August | Depends on approved launch date | Status not specified | Item 2. A-02 | Ask vendor to confirm access | Leon | Not specified | None stated | Status not specified | Item 3.

Human confirmation: decide whether to reduce the pilot group; assign the risk owner; set Leon's due date; confirm whether the revised launch date changes other milestones.

Por que isso funciona

  1. 1

    Separate registers stop tentative language from being silently promoted to a commitment.

  2. 2

    Evidence locators and missing-field labels support review and follow-up.

Verifique o resultado

  • Is every decision expressed as final in the source?

  • Were any owner, date, probability, or mitigation invented?

  • Does each extracted item include a usable source locator?

Use com confiança

Perguntas frequentes

Respostas práticas sobre quando usar esta receita, o que fornecer e onde a revisão humana ainda é importante

What should I prepare before using “Extract decisions, risks, and actions from a document”?

For “Extract decisions, risks, and actions from a document,” prepare Source document, Extraction scope, and Interpretation rules. Replace placeholders only with information you can verify. If a detail is unknown, preserve that uncertainty explicitly instead of asking the model to infer it.

When is the “Extract decisions, risks, and actions from a document” result not ready to use?

The result is not ready if it does not yet deliver the stated outcome—Separate decision, risk, and action tables with evidence and unresolved fields—from the supplied evidence, or if it relies on unresolved assumptions, missing approvals, or invented details. Use the checks as release gates: revise the source inputs or assign a named, authorized reviewer instead of polishing an unsupported output.

Which AI tools have recorded tests for “Extract decisions, risks, and actions from a document”?

The published test record for “Extract decisions, risks, and actions from a document” lists ChatGPT as of 2026-08-28. This confirms recorded runs, not guaranteed compatibility or identical results in later product versions. For another tool or version, keep every constraint visible and repeat the result checks before use.

Mais maneiras de explorar

Onde esta receita se encaixa

Mantenha o trabalho em andamento