Kostenlos registrieren

Diagnose knowledge gaps from wrong answers

Autor: AILesson8 Min. EinrichtungszeitGetestet mit:ChatGPTGeprüft am: 2026-08-28

Schnelle Antwort

Use answer evidence to separate concept, procedure, interpretation, and careless errors before planning remediation. Angeben: Course and target, Questions and attempts, Diagnosis constraints. Erwartetes Ergebnis: An evidence-linked gap map, confidence levels, diagnostic questions, and prioritized practice plan.

1

Kontext hinzufügen

Dein Text bleibt in diesem Browser. AILesson Prompts sendet ihn nicht an ein Modell oder einen Server.

2

Dein Prompt

Nicht ausgefüllte Felder bleiben als Platzhalter sichtbar, sodass du den Prompt weiterhin kopieren und bearbeiten kannst.

Diagnose knowledge gaps only from the supplied course context and answer evidence.

Course, level, objectives, source rules, and upcoming use:
[context]

Questions, learner working, answers, correct answers or rubric, and feedback:
[attempts]

Study time, depth, allowed materials, and solution policy:
[constraints]

For each error, quote or precisely locate the step that supports your diagnosis. Classify the most likely cause as concept, prerequisite, procedure, interpretation, recall, calculation, or execution slip, but do not treat a single mistake as proof of a stable gap. Separate observed evidence, hypotheses, and unknowns. Group repeated errors into underlying skills, show dependencies, and assign confidence. Propose one short diagnostic question per uncertain hypothesis before remediation. Then prioritize the smallest set of explanations, worked examples, retrieval practice, and transfer questions that fits the constraints. Withhold full solutions if requested. End with a reassessment rule that can confirm whether each gap has closed.
Im Playground ausprobieren
Standardmäßig privatDer Prompt wird lokal in deinem Browser zusammengestellt. Gib keine vertraulichen Informationen in einen KI-Dienst ein, es sei denn, deine Organisation erlaubt dies.

Von der Eingabe zum Ergebnis

Ein ausgearbeitetes Beispiel

Sieh dir an, wie konkreter Kontext dieses Rezept in ein nutzbares Ergebnis verwandelt.

Tatsächliche Eingabe

Course and target
Grade 8 linear equations. Objectives: distribute, combine like terms, preserve equality, and verify by substitution. Use only the supplied teacher key. Quiz retake is in 6 days.
Questions and attempts
Q1: 3(x+2)=15. Work: 3x+2=15, 3x=13, x=13/3. Key: x=3. Q2: 5x-7=2x+8. Work: 5x-2x=8+7, 3x=15, x=5. Key: x=5. Q3: 2(x-4)+3=11. Work: 2x-8+3=11, 2x-5=11, 2x=16, x=8. Key: x=8. No substitution checks shown.
Diagnosis constraints
Four 25-minute sessions. Diagnose before teaching. Do not reveal answers to diagnostic questions until I respond.

Beispielausgabe

Evidence-linked diagnosis

  1. Distribution across addition — medium confidence gap. Q1 changes 3(x+2) to 3x+2, so the multiplier was applied to x but not 2. Q3 correctly changes 2(x-4) to 2x-8, so this may be sign- or form-dependent rather than a fully missing rule.
  2. Moving terms and combining like terms — currently demonstrated. Q2 is correct and Q3 preserves equality through the isolation steps. One item each is insufficient for mastery.
  3. Verification by substitution — unknown, not a proven gap. No check is shown, but absence of written work does not establish inability.

Diagnostic questions, answers withheld A. Expand 4(y+3) and explain what the 4 multiplies. B. Expand -2(y-5) and explain each sign. C. Without resolving Q1, substitute 13/3 into both sides and report whether they match.

Priority plan: session 1 uses A and B to distinguish general distribution from sign handling, followed by two interleaved expansions. Session 2 practices equations where distribution is and is not needed. Session 3 adds substitution checks and error explanation. Session 4 uses three unseen mixed problems. Mark the gap closed only if at least three differently formed distribution items are correct with an explanation and the learner independently rejects an invalid result by substitution.

Warum das funktioniert

  1. 1

    Separating evidence from hypotheses prevents one wrong answer from becoming an unsupported label.

  2. 2

    Dependency-aware remediation addresses root prerequisites before repeated surface practice.

Ergebnis prüfen

  • Does every diagnosis point to specific answer evidence and state uncertainty?

  • Are careless slips distinguished from repeatable conceptual or procedural gaps?

  • Can the reassessment rule demonstrate that the learner transfers the repaired skill?

Sicher nutzen

Häufig gestellte Fragen

Praktische Antworten dazu, wann du dieses Rezept verwenden solltest, was du bereitstellen solltest und wo menschliche Prüfung weiterhin wichtig ist.

What should I prepare before using “Diagnose knowledge gaps from wrong answers”?

For “Diagnose knowledge gaps from wrong answers,” prepare Course and target, Questions and attempts, and Diagnosis constraints. Replace placeholders only with information you can verify. If a detail is unknown, preserve that uncertainty explicitly instead of asking the model to infer it.

When is the “Diagnose knowledge gaps from wrong answers” result not ready to use?

The result is not ready if it does not yet deliver the stated outcome—An evidence-linked gap map, confidence levels, diagnostic questions, and prioritized practice plan—from the supplied evidence, or if it relies on unresolved assumptions, missing approvals, or invented details. Use the checks as release gates: revise the source inputs or assign a named, authorized reviewer instead of polishing an unsupported output.

Which AI tools have recorded tests for “Diagnose knowledge gaps from wrong answers”?

The published test record for “Diagnose knowledge gaps from wrong answers” lists ChatGPT as of 2026-08-28. This confirms recorded runs, not guaranteed compatibility or identical results in later product versions. For another tool or version, keep every constraint visible and repeat the result checks before use.

Weitere Möglichkeiten zum Entdecken

Wo dieses Rezept hineinpasst

Text-PromptsLernen & StudiumUnterricht & BildungLeistungsüberprüfungen & RubrikenFür Lernende & Lehrende

Bring die Arbeit voran

AILesson · Empfohlene Kurse

Dein nächster Schritt: KI einsetzen

Vom Verstehen von KI zum Erledigen von Aufgaben. Übe Prompting, das Überprüfen und das Verbessern von Ergebnissen in interaktiven Lektionen für Arbeit und Alltag.

Alle Kurse entdecken
Titelbild von KI für Einsteiger

15 interaktive Lektionen

KI für Einsteiger

Beginne ein nützliches KI-Gespräch, verbessere die Antwort, prüfe das Wesentliche und erkenne, wann du selbst als Nächstes handeln musst.

Diesen Kurs entdecken
Titelbild von Grundlagen von ChatGPT

10 interaktive Lektionen

Grundlagen von ChatGPT

Lerne ChatGPT anhand von drei praktischen Abläufen kennen: Schließe einen ersten Chat ab, arbeite mit einer Datei und übernimm danach mit Projects einen geprüften Plan in einen neuen Chat.

Diesen Kurs entdecken
Titelbild von Wie generative KI funktioniert

7 interaktive Lektionen

Wie generative KI funktioniert

Verstehe, wie gängige KI-Chats Sprachmuster lernen, Nachrichten aus dem aktuellen Gespräch nutzen, Antworten erzeugen und Quellen sowie Werkzeuge einbinden.

Diesen Kurs entdecken